Last reviewed August 17, 2026

College Scorecard, and why it is not a CDS

The federal consumer tool answers cost, debt, and earnings questions the Common Data Set never did. It is not this year’s admit table, and we do not blend the two into one unlabeled number.

Origin

The Obama-era College Scorecard is a Department of Education consumer-information product. It was not designed as a guidebook survey. Schools do not fill it in the way they fill a Common Data Set. Administrative systems already hold the records; Scorecard publishes a join of those records for prospective students.

The official site at collegescorecard.ed.gov is the navigational result for “college scorecard.” This page is not trying to replace that. It exists so a reader of a school page here can see why a Scorecard earnings figure sits next to a CDS admit rate without becoming the same number.

What it actually is now

Current Scorecard institution files are a join of IPEDS, NSLDS (federal student aid), Treasury/IRS earnings, Federal Student Aid operating flags, and a handful of OPE and ACS fields. That mapping is in CDS vs College Scorecard.

Diagram of College Scorecard as a join of IPEDS, NSLDS, Treasury/IRS earnings, FSA, and OPE/ACS, not a school-authored Common Data Set.
College Scorecard source systems. Not a screenshot of ed.gov; a map of the join this site actually cites on school pages. See the pairing on Harvey Mudd.
What Scorecard is good at, what CDS is good at, and what neither covers
Scorecard is good atCDS is good atNeither
Net price, debt, repayment, earnings by cohortCurrent-year applicants / admits / enrolled (C1)Student-level records
Title IV universe (~6,000 institutions)Wait list, ED/EA, C7 factor matrix, H2A meritA single “latest” number that mixes vintages
Program-level CIP earnings on the .gov toolSchool-authored PDF/XLSX you can archive and citePredicting admission for one applicant

Coverage vs the Common Data Set

IPEDS reporting is mandatory for Title IV schools. The Common Data Set is voluntary. That is why a school with no public CDS still has a Scorecard row, and why this site’s directory stub can show federal facts without pretending a CDS exists. Harvey Mudd and Virginia Tech both publish a CDS; they are the worked examples because a reader can cross the CDS story and the IPEDS story on the same two institutions.

Coverage contrast: Title IV mandate gives every participating school a Scorecard row, while Common Data Set publication remains voluntary.
Coverage rule, not a school-year extract. Directory-only pages on this site exist because of this gap. Browse schools.

Lag, on a live school page

On Harvey Mudd and Virginia Tech, the admissions card is the archived CDS year. Directly under the federal outcomes band, the page already prints a vintage note: Scorecard outcomes reflect earlier cohorts than the CDS year shown elsewhere on the page. That pairing is the product. Scorecard is not “the latest CDS.”

Harvey Mudd school page pairing: archived Common Data Set year 2025-26 beside College Scorecard federal vintage note that outcomes lag the CDS year.
Harvey Mudd College school page. CDS year 2025-26 on the admissions side; College Scorecard vintage note on the federal outcomes side. Same pairing exists on Virginia Tech. Open the Harvey Mudd hub.

Why it belongs next to a CDS here

Families ask for net price, debt, and earnings. Those questions are Scorecard’s job. We show them on the school page, labeled as federal, and we do not fold them into §C or §H. Virginia Tech’s 2025-26 year page is still the place for wait-list and testing extracts from the school file.

What the official site does better

Program-level CIP earnings, the comparison tool, and the full dictionary live on collegescorecard.ed.gov. We do not impersonate that site. What we do instead is keep Scorecard on the same source-linked school page as the archived CDS and the IPEDS baseline, with the vintage mismatch visible.